I often argue that Universities are the biggest losers in the same-sex civil marriage debate (aka gay marriage). If the creative and educated classes leave for other countries (over same-sex immigration) or other states (for benefits and marriage), the Universities which have a seemingly higher percentage of same-sex couples are particularly hurt in the already competitive marketplace for top-tier educators.
But do Universities also stand to loose from alumni?
Slate makes a case (however ever obliquely — I’m reading between the lines here) for stable, child-filled families:
Alumni with kids are 13 percentage points more likely than alumni without kids to give in any year. The tendency to give rises slowly—by three more percentage points total—through kids’ early teens. At about age 14, as mom and dad see their kid’s algebra and composition grades, they decide whether he or she will apply to the alma mater. If they decide against, then they need not give extra to grease his way in. But if the kid is legacy material, then the parents might feel a need to show some generosity to Anon U.
I didn’t say this was exact. But it’s a pretty, um, straight line from alumni with families (stability, kids!) are more generous donors. And yet too often, Universities (I’m looking at you dear old U.Va.), sit on the sidelines in this debate.
comment spam, immigration equality edition :
Published 19 July 07 anarchy , and the revolution will be commented on , gay rights , immigration 1 CommentTo this post about ImEq’s Rachel Tiven on Bill O’Reilly, and the “killer answer” to the fraud question. I said:
And I meant it. The longer I’m in DC, the closer I come to overthrowing the government. Are you with me?